Click. Connect. Learn.

All posts in Khan Academy

Free and Open

Over at Big Think, Kirsten Winkler has a piece on Khan Academy and Wikipedia that she put out yesterday. In her piece, she sees a similarity between Khan Academy and Wikipedia:

So both, Khan and Wales, are proving that there is “a better way” to deliver true free education on the Internet. And I think this is the really radical part. If you take a look at what the Khan Academy is going to offer for free to educators one could ask why anyone would pay for similar products?

Wide open spaces & Dimensions

The fact that both Wikipedia and Khan Academy can be accessed without charge is great, but only considering the cost leaves out the real value: both of these resources can be reused, remixed, and redistributed because they are licensed under Creative Commons licenses that support reuse: Khan Academy uses the Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike variant, where Wikipedia uses the Attribution ShareAlike (It's also worth noting that Wikipedia is built on Mediawiki, an open source platform; I'd love to see the codebase of Khan Academy released for reuse under an Open Source license).

This is where the value comes in, and this is why these resources are important for education: licensing that supports reuse and recontextualization supports analysis, synthesis, and change. In short, the content can evolve with the learner, with the lesson, or with the pedagogical need.

Looking at the learning process as a thing that "needs" a business and a business model to support it misses the point entirely, and it's why people from a business background often don't understand education (in business speak, this generally translates as "the educational market is difficult to crack"). Education is a process; it unfolds over time, over iterations, and when it's working best it's never done. Education is different than certification. But businesses break things down to a transaction, a point of sale - that's not a bad thing, at all, until people conflate the business need of a company trying to profit off education with the needs of the learners that educational products need to serve.

This cultural difference - the focus on a limited time horizon, looking for a big exit; versus education that plays out over years - is frequently overlooked. And this cultural difference leads to people remaining focused on "free" as opposed to "reusable and sustainable." Free doesn't offer much as a business model, but reusable and sustainable offer worlds of opportunity.

Image Credit: "Wide open spaces & Dimensions" taken by regev tovim, published under an Attribution-No Derivatives license.

Khan Academy: Data, Design, and Open Content

It's pretty safe to say that Khan Academy arouses strong feelings; one of the barriers in appreciating what Khan Academy actually delivers is how Khan Academy is typically described. However, the conversations about Khan Academy often get bogged down in the goals and plans for the growth of Khan Academy, as opposed to how Khan can be used. In this post, I want to start with the basics: the elements of Khan Academy that are highlighted within the user interface (UI).

The basic premise of Khan - as reflected in the UI - is all about streamlining time on task, as defined by watching videos and working through problem sets.

The dashboard that measures student progress hews closely to these defined goals. A person can see how much time they have spent watching videos, working on problem sets, and how effective they have been at working through these problem sets.

The curriculum is organized into a series of related problem sets, and people can see their progress reflected in the overall scope and sequence, or as part of the grid that ties the quizzes together within a curricular scope.

The game mechanics keep the focus on working within the confines of the site, with students being rewarded for time on task, and for getting questions right. These game mechanics are baked into a student's work on the site; as a student works on problems, windows pop up and inform them that they can move on to a new exercise, or that they have earned a badge.

From the 30,000 foot view, Khan Academy appears to have given people a means to track progress across computerized tests, with tutorial videos provided to give background on a subject. As part of the package, teachers can monitor the work of their students; in the language used within the Khan Academy UI, this is called "coaching."

What's missing, of course, is any comparable emphasis on open ended thinking, or of problem solving that goes beyond quizzes that have a clear right or wrong answer. Also, while participants have the freedom to chart their own course through the video collection, the fact that people can choose their own path through a large set of videos does not change the fact that - from the perspective of an individual learner - a video collection, no matter how large, no matter how often the videos can be rewound and rewatched, is still just a video collection.

As others have noted, the pedagogical strategy of Khan Academy isn't new, despite the energy and zeal of people proclaiming the arrival of the “flipped classroom.” The notion of providing quality resources to students for asynchronous use outside of class -- and using class time for higher level problem solving, collaboration, and student-led inquiry -- feels pretty familiar to a lot of teachers, despite the fact that many bloggers, pundits, and policymakers seem to be stumbling upon the ideas only recently.

But Khan Academy delivers on two things, better than anything or anyone else has to date. First, the existence of the dashboard within the Khan Academy app has the potential to transform the way educators think about using and accessing data on student progress. The dashboard within Khan Academy is, at this writing, limited by what Khan Academy tracks - time on task, correct and incorrect answers on quiz problems - but even that limited info gives teachers (or "coaches," in KA-speak) the ability to help students in a more timely way. When I see the dashboard in place in KA, I imagine how much more effective a teacher could be if the dashboard was itself an opportunity for interaction between learners - what if, for example, a student could flag that they were stuck on a rough draft, or on a lab, or in using physics as a tool to improve their communities? Expanding the scope of what people can interact about is, at its core, a design issue. The data is there, but simple means to visualize and interact around that data are in short supply. The tools within Khan Academy provide a good starting point for conversations about the value of design within education.

The second thing that Khan has made more accessible is the value of openly licensed educational resources. All material on Khan Academy is licensed under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial license, which ensures that these resources, and any subsequent improvements, will remain freely available. Because of the enormous generosity of Salman Khan, and the resources he has marshalled into this effort, the world now has an enormous body of good quality material that can be used to learn about a broad range of subjects. The body of material within Khan Academy can be used to replace large sections of traditional textbooks. The support of high-visibility donors has given these resources a credibility that other openly licensed materials, for whatever reason, have never enjoyed. Salman Khan's effort and vision in building a large body of openly licensed material has shifted the way people think about open content. Partnerships with SmartHistory, and the plans to include community-created material within Khan Academy, will widen the breadth of content within Khan Academy, while ensuring that this new material remains freely available, freely modifiable, and freely reusable in perpetuity. Potentially, Khan Academy will be accessible enough that people will realize that textbooks provided by the publishing industry are an unnecessary expense we can all live without.

Khan Academy Is Better Than (Most Of) The Writing About Khan Academy

I've been spending some time recently looking at Khan Academy from a few different angles. This is something I probably should have done earlier, but I was so put off by some of the writing about Khan Academy that I almost made the mistake of discarding the subject because of the ill-formed praise directed at it. And this would have been unfortunate, because there is a lot to like about Khan Academy.

Facepalm

But getting into Khan Academy can be difficult if you actually read about it first, because many of the writers who attempt to cover Khan Academy invariably use Khan Academy as a vehicle for some other narrative about education.

From the Huffington Post:

Khan says his personal view is that "teachers unions don't act in the interest of most teachers. Many of the best teachers I know are being laid off because their unions value seniority over intellect, passion, creativity and drive."

Quotations like this - quotations that fetishize youth, and perpetuate the myth that an experienced teacher can't be intellectually curious, passionate, creative, or driven - really don't help. Generalizations about any profession are bound to be inaccurate. The fact that Salman Khan can make good videos shouldn't delude anyone into thinking he knows about teacher professional development, or the craft of working with kids.

We get this gem from Fast Company:

As thousands of college students graduate with no hope for employment, and the United States continues to lag behind others in math and science, citizens will be seeking some type of change. Perhaps Khan’s proposals are as likely as any.

This quotation is notable because it perpetuates the narrative that US scores are failing wholesale, and it embeds this narrative in an otherwise worthless puff piece on Khan Academy.

But, as we see here, if we actually look at the effect of socioeconomic status, the kids of rich people in the US get a great education. It's only the poor folks who get shortchanged.

One of the more notable articles about Khan comes from Clive Thompson at Wired. In the interest of brevity, I limited myself to only selecting one quotation from this article, but really, it is sufficiently bad to be worthy of several posts shredding its nearly infinite inadequacies.

Reformers today, by and large, believe student success should be carefully tested, with teachers and principals receiving better pay if their students advance more quickly and getting canned if they fall behind. They’re generally in favor of privately run charter schools and hotly opposed to the seniority rules of the teachers’ unions, if not the existence of unions altogether.

This quotation perpetuates the falsehood that all people looking to improve schools see unions as the problem, and more testing, more charter schools, and merit pay as the solution. It's unclear whether this fallacy is executed due to bad writing, intellectual laziness, or utter cluelessness about the educational landscape, but, for example, the folks at the Save Our Schools March are clearly interested in reform, yet share none of the attributes cited by Mr. Thompson.

But here's the thing: despite the hype machine in place behind Sal Khan, what he has created is actually better than the hype lets on. It's also different than the hype; the people hyping it are missing some of the better aspects of Khan Academy.

Over the next few days, I'll be putting out some additional posts looking at other aspects of Khan Academy. As I said earlier, the low quality of much of the writing about Khan Academy almost dissuaded me from looking at it altogether, and that would have been a mistake.

For those of you looking for examples of good writing about Khan Academy, look no further than Audrey Watters over at Hack Education. Her recent post, as well as her past writings on Khan, provide a good overview.

Image Credit: "Facepalm" taken by Santiago García Pimentel, published under an Attribution Non-Commercial ShareAlike license.

Syndicate content