All of the recent discussion about Facebook's change to its privacy policy obscures one frequently minimized point: privacy doesn't really exist on Facebook. While there is minimal control over what appears onscreen, this should not be confused with real, actual privacy, or the ability to control what is known about you. Facebook has your information, and by virtue of using their site, you have provided them a degree of control over your personal information.
This becomes particularly apparent when looking at Third Party Application developers. These external applications can access data in ways that are not immediately obvious to the end user, and in some cases this seems to work against people's obvious desires. In short: third party applications get the same access as the account that installed them, so if your privacy settings are set to friends only, and a third party app installed by a friend requests your information, it can get it. So, your privacy is as good as your least discrete friend's judgment.
But issues around abusing privacy aren't new for Facebook. They have these types of issues a few times a year, every year. Flash back to the launch of Beacon:
"Facebook still collects your data. Whether or not they show it onscreen or not is only marginally relevant. They have records of how you have used their site, and that information is valuable to people who want to sell you things."
Facebook has a well worn track record of disastrous handling of user data. In the beginning of 2009, Facebook pre-emptively changed their ToS. People were not happy, but people should not be surprised, as this is normal behavior for Facebook.
And Facebook's current "privacy policy" has some gems -- really, there are too many to list, but my favorite is probably from Section 3: Information You Share With Third Parties: "We take steps to ensure that others use information that you share on Facebook in a manner consistent with your privacy settings, but we cannot guarantee that they will follow our rules." Translation: People will get your information through our site, and we don't really have much/any control over what they do with your information.
And, of course, Facebook can change their privacy settings at will, thus eliminating the illusory value of these settings in the first place, as illustrated by this very conversation.
Some other good reads on this:
- The Facebook Blog: http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=197943902130
- Electronic Frontier Foundation: http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/facebooks-new-privacy-changes-good-...
- From ReadWriteWeb: http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_privacy_move_violates_con...
Comments
Against facebook
In the United Kingdom, the Trades Union Congress (TUC) has encouraged employers to allow their staff to access Facebook and other social networking sites from work, provided they proceed with caution.Facebook drew a fresh round of criticism after it began allowing non-members to search for users, with the intent of opening limited "public profiles" up to search engines such as Google in the following months.Facebook's privacy settings, however, allow users to block their profiles from search engines.
Concerns were also raised on the BBC's Watchdog programme in October 2007 when Facebook was shown to be an easy way in which to collect an individual's personal information in order to facilitate identity theft.However, there is barely any personal information presented to non-friends - if users leave the privacy controls on their default settings, the only personal information visible to a non-friend is the user's name, gender, profile picture, networks, and user name.Its better for all of us to leave facebook and join another social networking site like http://incliq.com/ , because it protect our privacy with its technology
Post new comment