FunnyMonkey Blog

Bill Fitzgerald | October 18, 2007

This release features both security and maintenance upgrades.

For new users, this is the best version to download and install. The download tarball contains a directory named "Instructions" that contains some instructions on getting started. For additional help, and/or to get involved with the DrupalEd community, submit issues to the issue queue or join the DrupalEd group.

Download DrupalEd here

For existing users, you do not need to download and install this tarball. Rather, you should be managing your upgrades by using the update status module. This module will help you keep your DrupalEd install current and secure. If you have an existing DrupalEd site, you should upgrade immediately to keep your site secure....

Bill Fitzgerald | October 4, 2007

In this session, participants will examine portfolios from several angles:

  1. as a learner, using the portfolio to track/present their day to day work;
  2. as a learner, using the portfolio as a tool to highlight individual artifacts in order to demonstrate learning over time;
  3. as an instructor, examining the various situations where portfolio use may or may not be the best choice to support student learning;
  4. as an instructor, using a portfolio as a professional development tool;
  5. as an administrator/evaluator, using a portfolio as a means of presenting the different types of learning occurring within a school or an organization.

The approach to portfolio development examined in this session, however, will differ from the approaches traditionally taken in other portfolio applications because the different types of portfolios described above can coexist in the same application, without the needs of one stakeholder...

Bill Fitzgerald | October 3, 2007

I've been thinking about Open Content recently for a few reasons -- As he does with many things, Jim Groom had a great post over on his blog about his experiences at Open Ed 2007.

Here is a lightly edited version of my comment on his post:

On days when I'm feeling cynical, I can't get around the sensation that some of the motivation driving the discussion on "issues of scalability, sustainability, localization, and other infra-structural issues" has less to do with scalability, sustainability, and culturally competent/translated content than it has to do with controlling the flow of content, or slowing the process while businesses figure out how to make money off of licensing.


Bill Fitzgerald | September 4, 2007

On a listserv in which I participate, a member recently asked about safe blogging tools for students. I was surprised to see several people recommend, a social networking service targeted at kids. This was my response to the list:

imbee's terms of service rule it out as a tool I would recommend to anyone.


"You understand and agree that you have no ownership rights in your account. imbee may cancel your account and delete all content associated with your account at any time, and without notice, if we deem that you have violated the terms of this agreement, or for any other reason."

So, as a teacher using this site, you should probably be aware that your data is there entirely at the discretion of It's the technological equivalent of couch-surfing to avoid paying rent. It's a great deal, until the person who owns the couch...

Bill Fitzgerald | August 17, 2007

I'll admit it at the outset: I'm in a bad mood today.

But when I see things like this, and this, and this, all talking about running courses in Facebook, I can't help myself

(Okay, really I can. But in this case, I don't want to).

Read Facebook's terms of service.

The "User Content Posted on the Site" section is particularly relevant here:

When you post User Content to the Site, you authorize and direct us to make such copies thereof as we deem necessary in order to facilitate the posting and storage of the User Content on the Site. By posting User Content to any part of the Site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to the Company an irrevocable, perpetual,...

Bill Fitzgerald | August 14, 2007

Get release 5.2-1 here.

From the upgrade notes included in the release:

This upgrade is in response to the CCK security announcement.

While this security upgrade only affects a specific use of CCK that is not present in the DrupalEd configuration, anyone running DrupalEd is strongly advised to upgrade. A healthy dose of paranoia regarding security concerns can save you hours of time/emotional distress.

Code updates:

With the exception of CCK, none of these...

Bill Fitzgerald | July 26, 2007

All users of DrupalEd should should know about a security upgrade to Drupal core. As this is a security upgrade, people with sites in production are advised to upgrade immediately.

The announcement, with upgrade directions, can be read here.

The new version of DrupalEd with all security patches applied can be downloaded here.

Bill Fitzgerald | July 16, 2007

In the few months since we released DrupalEd, there have been some upgrades in the codebase running the application. None of these upgrades are security issues, but many of them offer performance and functionality improvements.

If you are running the original version, there is no *need* to upgrade -- unless you want to have the newest, shiniest version of DrupalEd there is :)

Be sure to read the upgrade_notes.txt file that accompanies the download -- it gives an overview of the upgrades, and includes instructions for the upgrade. For more complete upgrade instructions, you should also refer to the Drupal handbook.

Without further ado, download the code.

Bill Fitzgerald | July 13, 2007

It looks like Ning has got some new friends -- I first saw the news at everybody's favorite home for digital whispers, and Marc Andreessen confirmed it on his blog.

Marc Canter has something to say about it, and Diego Doval responds.

Although the exchange started with news of Ning's newfound booty, Marc Canter brings the conversation back to an important place: the relative openness of social networks. My comment on Marc's post pretty much sums up my feelings on...

Bill Fitzgerald | June 22, 2007

I posted this comment in response to this post by George Siemens -- as of this writing, it's in his moderation queue, but I cut and pasted it here before hitting the submit button.

Hello, George,

Web 2.0 and open source are related but separate entities -- I wrote about this in a couple posts last year -- and --

This difference is very clear to many open source developers, but not always so clear to end users, who equate the type of "free" as embodied by GMail with the type of "free" as exemplified in code that can be freely downloaded and modified.

The challenge before us is to articulate the advantages of FOSS tools with regards to privacy, functionality...


Subscribe to FunnyMonkey Blog